tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2235937989038731789.post632075545221794065..comments2023-10-10T21:27:25.785+05:30Comments on goldwynism: . . .Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14656731507675566301noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2235937989038731789.post-9080162586380471822011-03-23T18:23:06.001+05:302011-03-23T18:23:06.001+05:30that is *exactly* what i'm talking about! we a...that is *exactly* what i'm talking about! we also reached the same conclusion in the seminar, that there can't be one cohesive image of Delhi, because there are so many different layers of the city. any space is probably best utilized when it's always used- multiple uses, and at multiple times of the day.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14656731507675566301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2235937989038731789.post-45344138314647737452011-03-23T16:29:05.398+05:302011-03-23T16:29:05.398+05:30hey bhavika, nice that our getting up early to map...hey bhavika, nice that our getting up early to map the mandis had all these long repercussions for you :) in a similar vein, i was thinking the other day: how come the tourism industry is trying to brand the "incredible india" image and then the government works so hard to make india (and esp. delhi) less and less incredible every day? i really like the slogan of the zapatistas to think about this whole question: "un mundo en el que caben muchos mundos" - a world in which there is space for many worlds. i think this is what we need most: a space of variety, in the city, in india, but even more so in the west where we so grandly managed to get rid of most of it already.Annanoreply@blogger.com